Friday, February 12, 2010

Laid-Back Shakespeare #3

Here's today's Shakespeare trivia. I'll call this: "Will's Kids."



William Shakespeare had three children: his first-born was a girl. It was on Sunday, the 26th of May, 1583, that Will’s daughter Susanna was christened.

She may well have been the apple of his eye. After her death her epitaph said she was “Witty above her sex,” and a local writer, years later, described her in this wise: “Something of Shakespeare was in her.”

Less than two years later Anne Hathaway Shakespeare gave birth to twins, a boy and a girl. So Will’s family was complete. He hadn’t yet made it to the age of twenty-one and he had acquired a wife and three kids.

(By the way, the picture above is not of the Shakespeare children; as you may have guessed, there is no picture of them. This is as close as I could come to one.)

Susanna may have been a lively, witty girl, but she settled down. She married John Hall, the most successful doctor in town. She would have had to settle down because Hall was a solid, no-nonsense Puritan.

Which makes all the more strange the events of 1613.

There was a local neerdowell in town, one John Lane, who had been in all kinds of trouble: he had been sued for riot and drunkenness and for having libeled various aldermen. You couldn’t go around libeling aldermen. Well, this character Lane told folks that the respectable Mrs. Susanna Hall had “the running of the reins (kidneys),” which was his indelicate way of claiming that she had gonorrhea.

He went further; he also claimed that she had been “naught” with a local hatter, Ralph Smith. “Naught,” in that time and in that context didn’t mean “nothing.” It meant “had screwed around with.”

Lively Susanna fought back. She sued Lane for slander.

In some ways, Stratford was a small town. Rumors of a scandalous nature were quick to circulate; it was important to quash them immediately. Susanna quashed effectively. John Lane didn’t show up at the trial and as a result he was excommunicated.

That may not seem like much to us, but in that society it was solid punishment. At any rate, Susanna had her reputation restored. At the back of my mind as I read of this event I had to wonder: was Susanna angry because someone thought she would have extra-marital sex, or that someone thought she would have extra-marital sex with a hatter? :-)

Will’s other two kids, the twins, were named Judith and Hamnet.

Judith had the misfortune to marry a guy pretty much like John Lane: Thomas Quiney. Will Shakespeare didn’t like this son-in-law at all. He had made another woman pregnant while courting Judith, which caused problems because soon after the marriage the woman died, along with her infant – a huge scandal. Quiney was brought before the court for “whoredom and uncleanness.” The marriage was off to a great start.

Will’s only son was named Hamnet. The natural conclusion would be that this name had something to do with the play “Hamlet,” but it seems that it didn’t. The boy (and his twin sister) were named after Will’s close, life-long friends, Hamnet and Judith Sadler.

It’s a sad fact that the playwright’s only son died at the age of eleven. How did Will react to his son’s death? He may have expressed his feelings when he wrote these powerful lines.

“Grief fills the room up of my absent child,
Lies in his bed, walks up and down with me,
Puts on his pretty looks, repeats his words,
Remembers me of all his gracious parts.”

26 comments:

lakeviewer said...

I just adore this trivia. Glad someone is feeding us a steady dose.

Berowne said...

lakeviewer: "I just adore this trivia."

And I just adore these wonderful comments. Thanks so much, lv.

Kajsa Hallberg Adu said...

Thanks for reading my blog, yours is lovely!

truestarr said...

What great "whimsical nuggets" of information you provide! Your blog is so interesting.

Thanks for digging up (and sharing) the bits and pieces, even if it IS your hobby.

Berowne said...

truestarr: >>What great "whimsical nuggets" of information you provide! Your blog is so interesting. <<

Almost as interesting as your enthusiastic comment -- thanx.

Berowne said...

Kajsa Hallberg Adu: "Thanks for reading my blog, yours is lovely."

Thanks much, Adu. (You see how Shakespeare keeps working his way into things?) :-)

ds said...

Fascinating--not trivial at all. What happened to the Shakespeare sisters after their experiences with the court system?

Berowne said...

ds: "Fascinating--not trivial at all."

Well, I have to admit I find Shakespeare stuff fascinating, too. I just call it "trivial" due to my overpowering sense of reticent diffidence.

Though it could be, rather, diffident reticence. :-)

"What happened to the Shakespeare sisters after their experiences with the court system?"

Stay tuned. There will be a post on "Will's Women."

Berowne said...

Special Note to ds:
I don't feel dull, I don't feel hollow.
I found myself in your "Blogs I Follow." :-)

French Fancy said...

I've always wondered about the name 'Hamnet'. Most names have remained in usage, albeit in a more modern form but I can honestly say I have never heard of anyone with this name

Berowne said...

FF--Yes, according to the scholars, of whom I am not one, "Hamnet" was not as uncommon a name at that time and at that place as it would be today.

Interestingly, when Hamnet and Judith Sadler had a son, they named him "William."

Betty Manousos:cutand-dry.blogspot.com said...

I came aross your site by accident and I just love your blog! Really fascinating post!. I liked the photo, too!
Have a great week-end!

Berowne said...

Betty Manousos: "I came aross your site by accident and I just love your blog! Have a great week-end!"

Betty, you just made it great -- thanks.

Betty Manousos:cutand-dry.blogspot.com said...

Thanks so much for following Cut And Dry!
I am your brand new follower!
:)

Betty Manousos:cutand-dry.blogspot.com said...

I loved your comment you left on my blog!
Thanks.

Madame DeFarge said...

You remain an education to us all. Life seems rather more exciting in those days. Who needs the National Enquirer?

Berowne said...

Mme DeF -- Wonderful comment, thanks.

Kevin Musgrove said...

"In some ways, Stratford was a small town. Rumors of a scandalous nature were quick to circulate..."

It still is!

Berowne said...

Kevin M. -- A good point. :-)

tattytiara said...

It is always interesting to hear what becomes of the children of legends. It's impossible to resist the curiosity of what does or doesn't rub off on them from their parentage.

Berowne said...

A good comment, tatty; thanks.

Sandy said...

More, more....

Sandy said...

Such scandal!

Berowne said...

Sandy -- Great to have such an appreciative audience. Thanx.

Shakey said...

Your blogs just get better and better. I'm a newcomer to Savage Reflections but I'm hooked already. I'm off to read Laidback 4 & 5 now. Great choice of picture by the way!

Anonymous said...

Ur Gay!!

 
Blog designed by Blogger Boutique using Christy Skagg's "A Little Bit of That" kit.